| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Evaludated against the RDA FAIR indicator V0.03, More details in the original assessment | |||||||
2 | Oncotrack pre-FAIRification assessment | |||||||
3 | Results: FAIR score-overall: 15%, FAIR score-mandatory: 23%, FAIR score-recommended: 6%, NA percentage:31.37%* | |||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | Indicator priority levels (Column E): Mandatory(Bold), Recommended, Optional(Italic) | |||||||
6 | Indicators that fullfilled are in Green | |||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | PRINCIPLE | INDICATOR_ID | INDICATORS | PRIORITY | Assessment overall | Assessment mandatory | Assessment recommended | |
9 | F | F1 | F1-01M | Metadata is identified by a persistent identifier | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - |
10 | F1 | F1-01D | Data is identified by a persistent identifier | Mandatory | NA | NA | - | |
11 | F1 | F1-02M | Metadata is identified by a universally unique identifier | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - | |
12 | F1 | F1-02D | Data is identified by a universally unique identifier | Mandatory | NA | NA | - | |
13 | F2 | F2-01M | Sufficient metadata is provided to allow discovery, following domain/discipline-specific metadata standard | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
14 | F3 | F3-01M | Metadata includes the identifier for the data | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
15 | F4 | F4-01M | Metadata is offered/published/exposed in such a way that it can be harvested and indexed | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - | |
16 | A | A1 | A1-01M | Metadata includes information about access conditions | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - |
17 | A1 | A1-01D | Data can be accessed manually (i.e. with human intervention) | Mandatory | NA | NA | - | |
18 | A1 | A1-02D | Data can be accessed automatically (i.e. by a computer program) | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
19 | A1 | A1-02M | Metadata identifier resolves to a metadata record | Mandatory | 1 | 1 | - | |
20 | A1 | A1-03D | Data identifier resolves to a digital object | Mandatory | NA | NA | - | |
21 | A1 | A1-03M | Metadata is accessed through standardised protocol | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
22 | A1 | A1-04D | Data is accessible through standardised protocol | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
23 | A1.1 | A1.1-01M | Metadata is accessible through a free access protocol | Mandatory | 1 | 1 | - | |
24 | A1.1 | A1.1-01D | Data is accessible through a free access protocol | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
25 | A1.1 | A1.1-02M | Metadata is accessible through an open-source access protocol | Recommended | 1 | - | 1 | |
26 | A1.1 | A1.1-02D | Data is accessible through an open-source access protocol | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
27 | A1.1 | A1.1-03D | Actions to be taken by a reuser to get access to the data are well documented | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
28 | A1.2 | A1.2-01M | Metadata includes information relevant for access control | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - | |
29 | A1.2 | A1.2-01D | Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication | Optional | NA | - | - | |
30 | A1.2 | A1.2-02D | Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authorisation | Optional | NA | - | - | |
31 | A2 | A2-01M | Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available | Mandatory | 1 | 1 | - | |
32 | I | I1 | I1-01M | Metadata uses knowledge representation expressed in standardised format | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - |
33 | I1 | I1-01D | Data uses knowledge representation expressed in standardised format | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
34 | I1 | I1-02M | Metadata uses machine-understandable knowledge representation | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - | |
35 | I1 | I1-02D | Data uses machine-understandable knowledge representation | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
36 | I1 | I1-03M | Metadata uses self-describing knowledge representation | Optional | 0 | - | - | |
37 | I1 | I1-03D | Data uses self-describing knowledge representation | Optional | NA | - | - | |
38 | I2 | I2-01M | Metadata uses standard vocabularies | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
39 | I2 | I2-01D | Data uses standard vocabularies | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
40 | I2 | I2-02M | Metadata uses FAIR-compliant vocabularies | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
41 | I2 | I2-02D | Data uses FAIR-compliant vocabularies | Optional | NA | - | - | |
42 | I3 | I3-01M | Metadata includes references to other metadata | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
43 | I3 | I3-01D | Data includes references to other data | Recommended | NA | - | NA | |
44 | I3 | I3-02M | Metadata includes references to other data | Optional | 0 | - | - | |
45 | I3 | I3-02D | Data includes sufficiently qualified references to other data | Optional | NA | - | - | |
46 | I3 | I3-03M | Metadata includes sufficiently qualified references to other metadata | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
47 | I3 | I3-04M | Metadata include sufficiently qualified references to other data | Optional | 0 | - | - | |
48 | R | R1 | R1-01M | Sufficient metadata is provided to allow reuse, following domain/discipline-specific metadata standard | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - |
49 | R1.1 | R1.1-01M | Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reused | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - | |
50 | R1.1 | R1.1-02M | Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
51 | R1.1 | R1.1-03M | Metadata includes licence information in the appropriate element of the metadata standard used | Mandatory | 0 | 0 | - | |
52 | R1.1 | R1.1-04M | Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
53 | R1.1 | R1.1-05M | Metadata includes information about consent for reuse (e.g. for personal data) | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
54 | R1.2 | R1.2-01M | Metadata includes provenance information according to community-specific standards | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
55 | R1.2 | R1.2-02M | Metadata includes provenance information according to a cross-domain language | Optional | 0 | - | - | |
56 | R1.3 | R1.3-01M | Metadata complies with a community standard | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
57 | R1.3 | R1.3-01D | Data complies with a community standard | Recommended | 0 | - | ? | |
58 | R1.3 | R1.3-02M | Metadata is expressed in compliance with a machine-understandable community standard | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
59 | R1.3 | R1.3-02D | Data is expressed in compliance with a machine-understandable community standard | Recommended | 0 | - | 0 | |
60 | ||||||||
61 | * FAIR level calculation | |||||||
62 | Score, overall = #(fullfilled indicators)/#(Total indicators assessed) | Sum | 4 | 3 | 1 | |||
63 | Score, mandatory = #(fullfilled mandatory indicators)/(#(Total mandatory indicators)-#(NA indicators)) | Score | 15% | 23% | 6% | |||
64 | Score, recommended = #(fullfilled recommended indicators)/(#(Total recommended indicators)-#(NA indicators)) | NAs percentage | 31.37% | |||||
65 | NA percentage = #(fnot applicable indicators)/#(All indicators) | |||||||